Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
30
Overall
33

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Announced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Kodak M575 and Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M575 was released 11 months later than the T900 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the M575 grades against the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony T900

 M575 T900 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010February 2009More recent by 11 months

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Kodak M575

 T900 M575 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display dimension3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony T900

 M575 T900 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M575 offers exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M575 and Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the M575 versus the T900.

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and T900.

Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Kodak M575 to show greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent M575 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Sony T900 Portrait photography highlights
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
27
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography features
Sony T900 Street photography features
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than others in class (152g)
low max ISO (1,000)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M575
Sports photography with Sony T900
26
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000 seconds)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M575
Travel photography with Sony T900
68
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (152 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
52
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
40
quite wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3")
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
37
has manual focus
big screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
Sony T900 as a Vlogging camera
28
quite wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
heavier than others in class (152g)
28
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M575 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Sony T900
 Kodak EasyShare M575Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Company Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-01-05 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1000 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3.5"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 2 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/1000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 pounds) 143 gr (0.32 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch price $139 $300