Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
96 Imaging
39 Features
41 Overall
39
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Key Specs
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sony TX10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2011
Photography Glossary Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Kodak M575 and Sony TX10, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the TX10 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M575 was brought out 19 months earlier than the TX10 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M575 grades vs the TX10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M575 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery & Sony TX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony TX10
| M575 | TX10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX10 over the Kodak M575
| TX10 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony TX10
| M575 | TX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX10 has proportions of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak M575 and Sony TX10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the M575 against the TX10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and TX10 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and TX10.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony TX10 to offer greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Kodak M575 Portrait photography features
Sony TX10 Portrait photography features
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Kodak M575 Street photography information
Sony TX10 Street photography information
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition in class (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus via touch
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Kodak M575 Sports photography advice
Sony TX10 Sports photography advice
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment sealing
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Kodak M575
Travel photography with Sony TX10
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (152g)
screen is not selfie friendly
environment sealing
provides focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
no Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Kodak M575 Landscape photography features
Sony TX10 Landscape photography features
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3")
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Kodak M575 Vlogging features
Sony TX10 Vlogging features
reasonably wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
heavier than competition in class (152g)
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak M575 vs Sony TX10 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 3.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $139 | $309 |