Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Launched May 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5500
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced April 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Samsung HZ50W and Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the HZ50W (14MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the HZ50W (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HZ50W was revealed 23 months before the SD1 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the HZ50W grades versus the SD1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ50W and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Samsung HZ50W Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
| HZ50W | SD1 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Samsung HZ50W
| SD1 Merrill | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2012 |  | May 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ50W and Sigma SD1 Merrill
| HZ50W | SD1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ50W offers outer measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ50W and Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the HZ50W against the SD1 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the HZ50W and SD1 Merrill is 70 and 57 respectively.
Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ50W and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The HZ50W having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will deliver greater detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older HZ50W is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung HZ50W vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
| Samsung HZ50W | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung HZ50W | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
| Otherwise known as | WB5500 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-05-03 | 2012-04-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 790g (1.74 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $2,339 |
