Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2010
Sony WX9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • n/ag - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Kodak M575 versus Sony WX9, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the WX9 (16MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M575 was released 12 months prior to the WX9 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the M575 grades vs the WX9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony WX9

 M575 WX9 

Reasons to pick Sony WX9 over the Kodak M575

 WX9 M575 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2010Newer by 12 months
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony WX9

 M575 WX9 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 comes with exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony WX9 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M575 versus Sony WX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the M575 against the WX9.

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and WX9 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The image underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and WX9.

To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony WX9 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged M575 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX9 Portrait photography highlights
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
30
decent MP (16MP)
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography advice
Sony WX9 Street photography advice
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
low max ISO (1,000)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX9 as a Sports photography camera
26
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
39
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography factors
Sony WX9 Travel photography factors
68
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
67
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography info
Sony WX9 Landscape photography info
40
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
good sized screen (3")
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
43
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Vlogging camera
Sony WX9 as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
33
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M575 vs Sony WX9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Sony WX9
 Kodak EasyShare M575Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M575 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2010-01-05 2011-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1000 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - XtraFine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 2s
Max shutter speed 1/1400s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m 5.30 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) -
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $139 $188