Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Photography Glossary Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Kodak M580 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M580 was released 3 years before the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the M580 matches up versus the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M580 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| M580 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak M580
| TG-820 iHS | M580 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months | |
| Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| M580 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M580 features external measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M580 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the M580 compared to the TG-820 iHS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M580 and TG-820 iHS is 90 and 92 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The photograph below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M580 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak M580 to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older M580 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak M580 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-29 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $169 | $500 |