Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
![Kodak EasyShare M580 front Kodak EasyShare M580 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Kodak-EasyShare-M580.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-50 front Ricoh WG-50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-50/Ricoh-WG-50-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Kodak M580 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The M580 was manufactured 8 years before the WG-50 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M580 matches up against the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M580 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M580 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Ricoh WG-50
M580 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Kodak M580
WG-50 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 95 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Ricoh WG-50
M580 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M580 enjoys exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M580 and Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the M580 against the WG-50.
![Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M580 and WG-50 is 90 and 91 respectively.
![Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M580 and WG-50.
Plainly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged M580 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M580-vs-Ricoh-WG-50-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M580 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M580 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $169 | $280 |