Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched June 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS20
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS15, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the ZS15 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was released 4 years earlier than the ZS15 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the 9000 grades versus the ZS15 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS15
9000 | ZS15 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus 9000
ZS15 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2012 | May 2009 | More modern by 38 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS15
9000 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS15 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS15 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the 9000 and the ZS15.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and ZS15 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and ZS15.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you really should take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2012-06-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $279 |