Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
![Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport/Kodak-Sport-front.jpg)
![Leica D-LUX 5 front Leica D-LUX 5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Leica-D-LUX-5/Leica-D-LUX-5-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Announced September 2010
- Updated by Leica D-Lux 6
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Kodak Sport versus Leica D-LUX 5, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Leica. The image resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the D-LUX 5 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the Sport (1/2.3") and D-LUX 5 (1/1.63") feature different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The Sport was launched 4 months later than the D-LUX 5 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Sport scores versus the D-LUX 5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Leica D-LUX 5. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Sport Gallery & Leica D-LUX 5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Leica D-LUX 5
Sport | D-LUX 5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Leica D-LUX 5 over the Kodak Sport
D-LUX 5 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Leica D-LUX 5
Sport | D-LUX 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | September 2010 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport provides outer measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Leica D-LUX 5 has proportions of 110mm x 66mm x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Sport versus Leica D-LUX 5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Sport vs the D-LUX 5.
![Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 size comparison Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Leica-D-LUX-5-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Sport and D-LUX 5 is 92 and 88 respectively.
![Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 top view buttons comparison Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Leica-D-LUX-5-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Sport and D-LUX 5.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Sport because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Kodak Sport will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively.
![Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 sensor size comparison Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Leica-D-LUX-5-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Leica-D-LUX-5-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Leica D-LUX 5 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Sport | Leica D-LUX 5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Leica |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Leica D-LUX 5 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-01-04 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 24-90mm (3.8x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.0-3.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.4" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 112k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 7.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $155 | $799 |