Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Sport was announced 5 years earlier than the SH-2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Sport grades against the SH-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Sport Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus SH-2
| Sport | SH-2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Kodak Sport
| SH-2 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 | January 2011 | More recent by 50 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 112k | Crisper screen (+348k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus SH-2
| Sport | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport has physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Sport and the SH-2.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Sport and SH-2 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The photograph here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Sport and SH-2.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus SH-2 to result in greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older Sport will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak Sport vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $155 | $399 |