Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak Sport versus Olympus XZ-10, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Sport was released 3 years prior to the XZ-10 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Sport grades against the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Sport and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Sport Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus XZ-10
| Sport | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Kodak Sport
| XZ-10 | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+808k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus XZ-10
| Sport | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak Sport enjoys outer dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Sport versus Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Sport vs the XZ-10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Sport and XZ-10 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and XZ-10.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs though you have to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older Sport is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Sport vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 112 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 221g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $155 | $428 |
