Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Sport was released within a month of the TG-310 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Sport grades against the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 Sport TG-310 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Kodak Sport

          

          

            
 TG-310 Sport 
Display sizing2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kClearer display (+118k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus TG-310

          

          

            
 Sport TG-310 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2011Similar age
Focus manually  No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Lack of Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport features external dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Sport against the TG-310.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Sport and TG-310 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and TG-310.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively.

            Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Kodak Sport Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography information
26
 supports face detect autofocus
 manual focus not available
 lack of manual mode
 external flash not possible
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
33
 MP count decent (14MP)
 offers face detection focusing
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Street Comparison
Kodak Sport Street photography features
Olympus TG-310 Street photography features
52
 environment sealing
 screen does not articulate
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 maximum ISO low (1,250)
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather sealing
 lighter than average (155g)
 screen is fixed
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
Kodak Sport Sports photography features
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography features
23
 environment sealing
 fixed focal length (35mm)
 low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 lack of image stabilization
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 weather sealing
 slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 bad battery life (150 shots)
 does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Kodak Sport Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography highlights
57
 environment sealing
 has built in flash
 missing Timelapse function
 MP count low (12MP)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
67
 lighter than average (155 grams)
 weather sealing
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 really wide (28mm)
 missing Time Lapse function
 bad battery life (150 per charge)
 does not have a selfie friendly screen
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
 Kodak Sport as a Landscape photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Landscape photography camera
27
 environment sealing
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 fixed focal length (35mm)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 tiny screen (2.4 inch)
 lack of manual mode
 lack of image stabilization
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 maximum ISO low (1,250)
 lacks RAW support
 missing Timelapse function
39
 really wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count decent (14 megapixels)
 weather sealing
 no manual focus
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 screen is small (2.7 inches)
 no manual control
 tiny sensor (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW format
 bad battery life (150 per charge)
 missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Sport Vlogging features
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging features
25
 supports face detect autofocus
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 lack of image stabilization
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
 missing microphone socket
32
 really wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 offers face detection focusing
 lighter than average (155 grams)
 slow max aperture (f3.9)
 does not have a selfie friendly screen
 video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
 missing external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        

          

            
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Olympus TG-310
 Kodak EasyShare SportOlympus TG-310
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Sport Olympus TG-310
Class Waterproof Waterproof
Revealed 2011-01-04 2011-01-06
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection focus    
Contract detection focus    
Phase detection focus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.4 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 112 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen technology TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Custom white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 4.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lbs) 155 grams (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $155 $0