Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Also Known as mju 550WP
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 550WP, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the 550WP (10MP) is pretty similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and 550WP (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was manufactured 4 months before the 550WP so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 550WP being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-520 matches up against the 550WP in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus 550WP
| E-520 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus E-520
| 550WP | E-520 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 550WP
| E-520 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2008 |  | January 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 provides outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus 550WP has proportions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 550WP in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 against the 550WP.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and 550WP is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and 550WP.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-520 includes the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Alternative name | - | mju 550WP |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 7cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $399 |