Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Kodak Sport versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, both Waterproof cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Sport was launched 13 months prior to the TG-820 iHS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Sport grades against the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Sport Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Sport | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak Sport
| TG-820 iHS | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 1030k | 112k | Crisper display (+918k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Sport | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport comes with outer measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Sport versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Sport vs the TG-820 iHS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and TG-820 iHS is 92 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Sport and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should always take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Sport will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Sport vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $155 | $500 |