Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Photography Glossary Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we are matching up the Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Sport was announced 5 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Sport matches up versus the WG-5 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Sport Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| Sport | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Kodak Sport
| WG-5 GPS | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper display (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| Sport | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Kodak Sport provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Sport vs the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Sport and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The older Sport is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Sport vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 pounds) | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $155 | $500 |