Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung ST100, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Pentax and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-3 GPS was released 3 years after the ST100 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-3 GPS scores versus the ST100 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung ST100. The complete galleries are provided at Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery and Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Samsung ST100
WG-3 GPS | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
ST100 | WG-3 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 460k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 GPS and Samsung ST100
WG-3 GPS | ST100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-3 GPS has external dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST100 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Pentax WG-3 GPS versus Samsung ST100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-3 GPS against the ST100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-3 GPS and ST100 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-3 GPS and ST100.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Pentax WG-3 GPS to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger WG-3 GPS will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax WG-3 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung ST100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Samsung |
Model type | Pentax WG-3 GPS | Samsung ST100 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 238 grams (0.52 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $350 | $250 |