Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
91 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Kodak Sport versus Samsung WB850F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Sport was introduced 12 months prior to the WB850F which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Sport scores versus the WB850F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Sport Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Samsung WB850F
| Sport | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Kodak Sport
| WB850F | Sport | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2011 | More recent by 12 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 112k | Sharper screen (+502k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Samsung WB850F
| Sport | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport provides physical dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Sport versus Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Sport versus the WB850F.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Sport and WB850F is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Sport and WB850F.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB850F to offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older Sport is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Sport vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Sport | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Samsung WB850F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 112k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $155 | $599 |