Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000
92 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
![Kodak EasyShare Sport front Kodak EasyShare Sport front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport/Kodak-Sport-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000/Sony-S2000-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the Sport (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The Sport was launched 13 months after the S2000 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Sport grades against the S2000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Sport & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Sport Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Sony S2000
Sport | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Kodak Sport
S2000 | Sport | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 112k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Sport and Sony S2000
Sport | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Sport provides outside measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Sport and the S2000.
![Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 size comparison Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Sport and S2000 is 92 and 93 respectively.
![Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Sport and S2000.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Kodak Sport to offer more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer Sport should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
![Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-Sport-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-S2000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Sport vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Sport | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Sport | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-01-04 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1250 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 112 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $155 | $225 |