Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched March 2013
- Succeeded the Nikon P310
- Updated by Nikon P340
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the P330 (12MP) is pretty close but the Touch (1/3") and P330 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Touch was released 3 years prior to the P330 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Touch being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon P330 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Touch scores vs the P330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Touch & Nikon Coolpix P330. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Touch Gallery & Nikon P330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Nikon P330
Touch | P330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Kodak Touch
P330 | Touch | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Touch and Nikon P330
Touch | P330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Touch has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Nikon P330 has proportions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Touch versus the P330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and P330 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Touch and P330.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Touch due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Kodak Touch will render extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The older Touch will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Touch vs Nikon P330 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Touch | Nikon Coolpix P330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Touch | Nikon Coolpix P330 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-01-04 | 2013-03-04 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 17.3mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 6.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 200g (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 213 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $100 | $500 |