Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020
91 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus 6020, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is pretty close but the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and 6020 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z1485 IS was manufactured 13 months earlier than the 6020 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the Z1485 IS scores versus the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Olympus 6020
| Z1485 IS | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Kodak Z1485 IS
| 6020 | Z1485 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus 6020
| Z1485 IS | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Z1485 IS has physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus 6020 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Z1485 IS and the 6020.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z1485 IS and 6020 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specifications. The image below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Z1485 IS and 6020.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Z1485 IS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Kodak Z1485 IS will provide you with more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged Z1485 IS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $179 | $279 |