Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/1.72" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z1485 IS (14MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively similar but the Z1485 IS (1/1.72") and VR-320 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Z1485 IS was manufactured 3 years prior to the VR-320 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the Z1485 IS scores versus the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z1485 IS Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z1485 IS over the Olympus VR-320
| Z1485 IS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Kodak Z1485 IS
| VR-320 | Z1485 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 30 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Kodak Z1485 IS and Olympus VR-320
| Z1485 IS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z1485 IS has exterior measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z1485 IS versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Z1485 IS versus the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Z1485 IS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z1485 IS and VR-320.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The Z1485 IS has the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh simpler. The more aged Z1485 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z1485 IS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.4 x 5.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4352 x 3264 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $179 | $179 |