Clicky

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410

Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
18
Overall
27
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
 
Olympus E-410 front
Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Key Specs

Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Released January 2009
Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2007
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-410
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-400
  • Updated by Olympus E-420
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the E-410 (10MP) is very close but the Z915 (1/2.3") and E-410 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The Z915 was manufactured 20 months after the E-410 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Z915 matches up versus the E-410 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus E-410

 Z915 E-410 
IntroducedJanuary 2009June 2007Newer by 20 months
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Kodak Z915

 E-410 Z915 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing

Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-410

 Z915 E-410 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension2.5"2.5"Identical display size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 has physical dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus E-410 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Z915 against the E-410.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and E-410 is 91 and 77 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z915 and E-410.

All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The Z915 uses the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF more difficult. The younger Z915 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z915 Portrait photography info
Olympus E-410 Portrait photography info
19
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
56
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Z915
Street photography with Olympus E-410
54
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
60
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-410 as a Sports photography camera
24
image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,250s)
max frames per second low (2.0 frames/s)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
42
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z915 Travel photography details
Olympus E-410 Travel photography details
54
has built in flash
long reach (350mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
49
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z915 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-410 Landscape photography details
27
image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.5 inch)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
50
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z915 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-410 Vlogging advice
24
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
9
no video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-410
 Kodak EasyShare Z915Olympus E-410
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z915 Olympus E-410
Alternate name - EVOLT E-410
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2009-01-08 2007-06-14
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 25 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.5-4.8 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Amount of lenses - 45
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 215 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1250s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 194 grams (0.43 lbs) 435 grams (0.96 lbs)
Dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 51
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.0
DXO Low light rating not tested 494
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $200 -