Clicky

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2

Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
18
Overall
27
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs

Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview

The following is a in depth assessment of the Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-PL2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the E-PL2 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the Z915 (1/2.3") and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Z915 was unveiled 3 years before the E-PL2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the Z915 scores vs the E-PL2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus E-PL2

 Z915 E-PL2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Kodak Z915

 E-PL2 Z915 
AnnouncedFebruary 2011January 2009Newer by 25 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-PL2

 Z915 E-PL2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 has got external measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-PL2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Z915 against the E-PL2.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and E-PL2 is 91 and 85 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and E-PL2.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z915 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-PL2 will resolve greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Z915 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z915 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography details
19
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Z915 Street photography features
Olympus E-PL2 Street photography features
54
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z915 Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography details
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250s)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (280 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z915 Travel photography information
Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography information
54
flash built-in
long zoom (350mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
51
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (280 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z915 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography details
27
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
61
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (280 shots)
does not have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z915 Vlogging features
Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging features
24
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-PL2
 Kodak EasyShare Z915Olympus PEN E-PL2
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z915 Olympus PEN E-PL2
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2009-01-08 2011-02-11
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Truepic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 25 11
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 35-350mm (10.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.5-4.8 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Available lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194g (0.43 lb) 362g (0.80 lb)
Dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 55
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.2
DXO Low light score not tested 573
Other
Battery life - 280 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $200 $0