Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z915 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Z915 grades versus the TG-830 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| Z915 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Kodak Z915
| TG-830 iHS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| Z915 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 has got exterior dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Z915 and the TG-830 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and TG-830 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z915 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to render more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The older Z915 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 214 grams (0.47 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $200 | $0 |