Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z915 was introduced 5 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Z915 scores vs the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Z915 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Kodak Z915
| TG-2 iHS | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 54 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Z915 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Kodak Z915 enjoys exterior measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Z915 against the TG-2 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and TG-2 iHS is 91 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z915 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-2 iHS to deliver greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged Z915 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $380 |