Clicky

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Introduced June 2010
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak Z950 and Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Z950 was unveiled 19 months earlier than the TG-320 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the Z950 matches up against the TG-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 Z950 TG-320 
Manually focus  Very precise focus
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak Z950

          

          

            
 TG-320 Z950 
RevealedJanuary 2012June 2010More recent by 19 months
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 Z950 TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen  Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display  Neither offers Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Z950 offers physical measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z950 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Z950 against the TG-320.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z950 and TG-320 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Normally, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Z950 and TG-320.
As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to provide you with more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older Z950 will be behind in sensor tech.

            Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Kodak Z950 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
28
 manual focus
 no external flash support
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
33
 good  resolution (14MP)
 has face detect focus
 lack of manual focus
 lack of manual exposure
 no external flash support
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Kodak Z950 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
52
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 heavier than others in class (243g)
66
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proofing
 lighter than competitors (155 grams)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Kodak Z950
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
27
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
40
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 has tracking focus
 environment proofing
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 low battery power (150 CIPA)
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Travel Comparison
Kodak Z950 Travel photography details
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography details
52
 has built in flash
 very long reach (350mm)
 missing Time Lapse function
 heavier than others in class (243 grams)
 MP count low (12MP)
 does not offer selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
67
 lighter than competitors (155g)
 environment proofing
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (28mm)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
 low battery power (150 shots)
 display is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Kodak Z950 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
37
 manual focus
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 missing Time Lapse function
39
 decently wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 environment proofing
 lack of manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7")
 lack of manual exposure
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 does not have RAW support
 low battery power (150 CIPA)
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Kodak Z950
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
24
 has image stabilization (Optical)
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 does not offer selfie friendly screen
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 missing mic socket
 heavier than others in class (243g)
32
 decently wide (28mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 has face detect focus
 lighter than competitors (155g)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
 doesn't have microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
        
                
        

          

            
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z950 and Olympus TG-320
 Kodak EasyShare Z950Olympus TG-320
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z950 Olympus TG-320
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-06-16 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect autofocus    
Contract detect autofocus    
Phase detect autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-350mm (10.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-4.8 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing distance 6cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/8 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 5.40 m 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 243g (0.54 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 150 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7003 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $250 $0