Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
89 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe Z950 was announced 20 months earlier than the TG-820 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the Z950 grades vs the TG-820 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z950 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z950 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Z950 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Kodak Z950
| TG-820 iHS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 20 months |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Z950 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z950 offers external dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Z950 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Z950 and TG-820 iHS is 89 and 92 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Z950 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photos but you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged Z950 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak Z950 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 6cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 243 grams (0.54 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $500 |