Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z980 was unveiled 8 years before the SH-3 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Z980 matches up versus the SH-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus SH-3
| Z980 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Kodak Z980
| SH-3 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | January 2009 | More recent by 86 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 201k | Clearer display (+259k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus SH-3
| Z980 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z980 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus SH-3 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the Z980 versus the SH-3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and SH-3 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z980 and SH-3.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus SH-3 to give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older Z980 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-05 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 201k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 271g (0.60 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $579 |