Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Z980 was brought out 4 years before the VG-160 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Z980 scores vs the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus VG-160
| Z980 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Kodak Z980
| VG-160 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 36 months | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 201k | Crisper screen (+29k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus VG-160
| Z980 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z980 has got outer dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Z980 compared to the VG-160.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and VG-160 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z980 and VG-160.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus VG-160 to show greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged Z980 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 201k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $249 | $90 |