Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
Photography Glossary Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Kodak Z980 and Olympus VH-515, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the VH-515 (12MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z980 was launched 4 years before the VH-515 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Z980 scores against the VH-515 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Olympus VH-515. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus VH-515
| Z980 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Kodak Z980
| VH-515 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 44 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 201k | Clearer display (+259k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus VH-515
| Z980 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 has exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus VH-515 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z980 and Olympus VH-515 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Z980 and the VH-515.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and VH-515 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z980 and VH-515.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account. The older Z980 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-05 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 201 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $249 | $648 |