Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Kodak Z980 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Z980 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z980 was unveiled 3 years before the VR-330 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Z980 matches up against the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus VR-330
| Z980 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Kodak Z980
| VR-330 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 201k | Clearer display (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus VR-330
| Z980 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 has got outer measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z980 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Z980 vs the VR-330.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and VR-330 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z980 and VR-330.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z980 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-05 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 201k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $249 | $220 |