Clicky

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
68
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37
Kodak EasyShare Z980 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Kodak Z980
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Z980 was launched 4 years prior to the VR-340 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Z980 scores vs the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus VR-340

 Z980 VR-340 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Kodak Z980

 VR-340 Z980 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2009More recent by 36 months
Display resolution460k201kSharper display (+259k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus VR-340

 Z980 VR-340 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 offers physical dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Z980 against the VR-340.

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and VR-340 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specs. The graphic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Z980 and VR-340.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-340 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older Z980 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z980 Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography info
41
manual focus
exports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
34
good resolution (16MP)
has face detect focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Z980
Street photography with Olympus VR-340
54
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z980 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Sports photography camera
34
incredible zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low fps (1.0 fps)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z980 Travel photography features
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography features
51
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
long zoom (624mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z980 Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography features
45
manual focus
really wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse function
43
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Z980
Vlogging with Olympus VR-340
23
really wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
33
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic support
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z980 and Olympus VR-340
 Kodak EasyShare Z980Olympus VR-340
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z980 Olympus VR-340
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-05 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-624mm (24.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.0 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 201 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 16s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.30 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 445 grams (0.98 pounds) 125 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $249 $130