Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Kodak Z980 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z980 was revealed 7 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Z980 grades versus the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| Z980 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Kodak Z980
| WG-5 GPS | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 201k | Crisper screen (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| Z980 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Z980 enjoys external dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z980 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Z980 and the WG-5 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and WG-5 GPS is 68 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The graphic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z980 and WG-5 GPS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Z980 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Z980 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 201 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $249 | $500 |