Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400
68 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Announced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Kodak Z980 versus Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and H400 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Z980 was unveiled 6 years earlier than the H400 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Z980 being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Z980 grades versus the H400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z980 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are available at Kodak Z980 Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Sony H400
| Z980 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Kodak Z980
| H400 | Z980 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | January 2009 | More modern by 62 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 201k | Crisper screen (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Sony H400
| Z980 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z980 features physical dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Sony H400 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z980 versus Sony H400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Z980 and the H400.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z980 and H400 is 68 and 62 respectively.
Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z980 and H400.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Sony H400 to result in greater detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Z980 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak Z980 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z980 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-05 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 201 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.30 m | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 pounds) | 628g (1.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $268 |