Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300
66 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
91 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Revealed July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Released July 2012
- Replaced the Nikon S9100
- Successor is Nikon S9500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Kodak Z981 and Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. The image resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Z981 was launched 24 months earlier than the S9300 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Z981 scores versus the S9300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Nikon Coolpix S9300. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Nikon S9300
| Z981 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Kodak Z981
| S9300 | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2012 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 201k | Sharper display (+720k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Nikon S9300
| Z981 | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Kodak Z981 has got outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Nikon S9300 has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z981 and Nikon S9300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z981 against the S9300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z981 and S9300 is 66 and 91 respectively.
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Z981 and S9300.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon S9300 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older Z981 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z981 vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-07-06 | 2012-07-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 201k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 6.9fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 200 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $299 | $249 |