Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c378d/c378dd1d27b87b0a840c3383b7475dd39cae096c" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z981 front Kodak EasyShare Z981 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z981 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the Z981 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Z981 was launched 7 years prior to the FZ2500 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z981 matches up against the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Panasonic FZ2500
Z981 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Kodak Z981
FZ2500 | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 75 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 201k | Sharper screen (+839k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ2500
Z981 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z981 features external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has proportions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
See the Kodak Z981 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Z981 compared to the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/485f8/485f8f47895b05d5f7c2fe9fddd759502dc9aa98" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z981 and FZ2500 is 66 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be61c/be61c002d416f31963f22f5e785291205bab5805" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The image underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z981 and FZ2500.
Plainly, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z981 due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic FZ2500 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged Z981 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df894/df8940a71d43a4539a990d39cd6b2013a1b8223a" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c117/3c117fe9e947ec6f2cb0e58f130f5364af061f65" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Kodak Z981 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 201k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.20 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $299 | $998 |