Clicky

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
66
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36
Kodak EasyShare Z981 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Kodak Z981
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
  • Revealed July 2010
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the Z981 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Z981 was unveiled 11 months after the CX2 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Z981 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Z981 matches up versus the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Ricoh CX2

 Z981 CX2 
LaunchedJuly 2010August 2009Newer by 11 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Kodak Z981

 CX2 Z981 
Display resolution920k201kClearer display (+719k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Ricoh CX2

 Z981 CX2 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Z981 comes with outer dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") along with a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check the Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the Z981 versus the CX2.

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z981 and CX2 is 66 and 93 respectively.

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Z981 and CX2.

As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Kodak Z981 to provide greater detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The younger Z981 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z981 Portrait photography information
Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography information
45
has manual focus
good MP (14MP)
exports RAW files
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
25
focusing manually
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak Z981 Street photography advice
Ricoh CX2 Street photography advice
50
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than average (540g)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (185g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z981 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography info
43
long zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14MP)
low fps (1.0 fps)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Z981
Travel photography with Ricoh CX2
53
good MP (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
very long zoom (676mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average (540g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
66
lighter than competitors in class (185 grams)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (9MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z981 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography factors
51
has manual focus
decently wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (14MP)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse function
42
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z981 Vlogging information
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging information
22
decently wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic support
heavier than average (540g)
30
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (185 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Z981 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z981 and Ricoh CX2
 Kodak EasyShare Z981Ricoh CX2
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare Z981 Ricoh CX2
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-07-06 2009-08-20
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-676mm (26.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.0 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 201 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.20 m 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 540g (1.19 pounds) 185g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $299 $341