Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Older Model is Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the SP-600 UZ (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-600 UZ was unveiled 24 months earlier than the WG-2 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the SP-600 UZ grades against the WG-2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-600 UZ & Pentax Optio WG-2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Pentax WG-2
SP-600 UZ | WG-2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
WG-2 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 24 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-600 UZ and Pentax WG-2
SP-600 UZ | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-600 UZ offers outside dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the SP-600 UZ vs the WG-2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-600 UZ and WG-2 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-600 UZ and WG-2.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 to provide greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older SP-600 UZ will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-600 UZ vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus SP-600 UZ | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus SP-600 UZ | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 455 grams (1.00 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $189 | $350 |