Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F
Portability
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
Kodak Z981
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Launched July 2010
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Z981 (14MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z981 was released 4 years prior to the WB2200F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Z981 scores against the WB2200F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Samsung WB2200F
| Z981 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Kodak Z981
| WB2200F | Z981 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 42 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 201k | Sharper display (+259k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB2200F
| Z981 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z981 features outside measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") along with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z981 and Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Z981 compared to the WB2200F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z981 and WB2200F is 66 and 59 respectively.
Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The image below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Z981 and WB2200F.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to show extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged Z981 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Kodak Z981
Portrait photography with Samsung WB2200F
you can focus manually
good resolution (14MP)
saves RAW files
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Kodak Z981 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB2200F as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (540 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition in class (708g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Kodak Z981 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Kodak Z981 Travel photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography highlights
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
very long zoom (676mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (540g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (20mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (708g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Kodak Z981 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography info
you can focus manually
fairly wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
really wide (20mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Kodak Z981
Vlogging with Samsung WB2200F
fairly wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic jack
heavier than competition (540 grams)
really wide (20mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (708 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Kodak Z981 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 201 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.20 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $299 | $599 |