Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III
66 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c378d/c378dd1d27b87b0a840c3383b7475dd39cae096c" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z981 front Kodak EasyShare Z981 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eadd/6eadd23cb6eb920907ea68f225c04742fabb0e6f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 540g - 124 x 85 x 105mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
- Successor is Sony RX10 IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Kodak Z981 and Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the Z981 (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the Z981 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Z981 was released 6 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Z981 matches up vs the RX10 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z981 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Z981 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z981 over the Sony RX10 III
Z981 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Kodak Z981
RX10 III | Z981 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 69 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 201k | Clearer screen (+1028k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z981 and Sony RX10 III
Z981 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z981 provides exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") having a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z981 and Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Z981 and the RX10 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a386/1a3860ba0307f78f594116060c014d75fadef62d" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z981 and RX10 III is 66 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32fdc/32fdcf9bbdabf7c92418120dd65fc44f5c279a2c" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z981 and RX10 III.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Z981 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX10 III will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older Z981 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5526/e5526f561f676503ce65c41611e15a3415daf0aa" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81728/81728718e8a1abf6ace7b3ce9e55ab21288eb496" alt="Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Z981 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z981 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 201k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.20 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lbs) | 1051 gr (2.32 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $299 | $1,398 |