Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Kodak Z990 versus Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z990 was introduced 17 months later than the CX2 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Z990 grades against the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z990 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Z990 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Ricoh CX2
| Z990 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Kodak Z990
| CX2 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Ricoh CX2
| Z990 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z990 has got exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Kodak Z990 versus Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Z990 and the CX2.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z990 and CX2 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Z990 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Z990 to offer more detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Z990 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z990 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Alternate name | EasyShare Max | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.90 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 185g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $299 | $341 |