Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Photography Glossary Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the Z990 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Z990 was brought out 6 months before the WB210 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Z990 matches up versus the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z990 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are available at Kodak Z990 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Samsung WB210
| Z990 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 1k | Crisper screen (+459k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Kodak Z990
| WB210 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Samsung WB210
| Z990 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | July 2011 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z990 features outer measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Z990 versus the WB210.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z990 and WB210 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The photograph here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z990 and WB210.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB210 to give you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB210 |
| Also Known as | EasyShare Max | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.90 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445g (0.98 lbs) | 174g (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $299 | $279 |