Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Photography Glossary Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Kodak Z990 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z990 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB2200F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Z990 scores vs the WB2200F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z990 and Samsung WB2200F. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak Z990 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Samsung WB2200F
| Z990 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Kodak Z990
| WB2200F | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 36 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Samsung WB2200F
| Z990 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z990 has exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Z990 versus Samsung WB2200F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 versus the WB2200F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z990 and WB2200F is 68 and 59 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The photograph below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Z990 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB2200F to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older Z990 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Also Known as | EasyShare Max | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.90 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $299 | $599 |