Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Other Name is EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
The following is a complete review of the Kodak Z990 versus Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Z990 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Z990 was revealed 24 months prior to the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Z990 scores vs the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z990 & Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are provided at Kodak Z990 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Samsung WB250F
| Z990 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Kodak Z990
| WB250F | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 24 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Samsung WB250F
| Z990 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z990 has got outer dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z990 versus Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the Z990 vs the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Z990 and WB250F is 68 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z990 and WB250F.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Samsung WB250F to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Z990 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung WB250F |
| Also called | EasyShare Max | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.90 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $299 | $250 |