Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Launched January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS40
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic ZS35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 9000 was revealed 5 years before the ZS35 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 9000 matches up vs the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Panasonic ZS35
9000 | ZS35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus 9000
ZS35 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | May 2009 | More modern by 56 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Panasonic ZS35
9000 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 offers outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 versus the ZS35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and ZS35 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The pic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and ZS35.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Panasonic ZS35 to result in more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $300 | $300 |