Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9232/e92328f7879ab167afbf88f2f8a3bd1e3b73fcb4" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z990 front Kodak EasyShare Z990 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef3ef/ef3ef6db878f09ebdcfc7b9bfb9837bae64cabe2" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front"
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Released January 2011
- Also referred to as EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Sony RX10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the Z990 (1/2.3") and RX10 (1") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Z990 was released 4 years before the RX10 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Z990 scores vs the RX10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z990 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery and Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Sony RX10
Z990 | RX10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Kodak Z990
RX10 | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 39 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1290k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+830k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Sony RX10
Z990 | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z990 enjoys external dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Sony RX10 has sizing of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 compared to the RX10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f710b/f710bf833098bff325c5397033723b06717ec6db" alt="Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 size comparison Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Z990 and RX10 is 68 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ee38/3ee38298c6bf592c2c3b28bbfa224da0aa25a15d" alt="Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z990 and RX10.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z990 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX10 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged Z990 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3358e/3358edc93df0ccc5afab88b1f5b245a64b4fa8ad" alt="Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison"
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4f7/2d4f740900a5df5dbf5eaea8f4045ccf1f550f73" alt="Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak Z990 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Otherwise known as | EasyShare Max | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-01-04 | 2014-03-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,290 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.90 m | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 gr (0.98 pounds) | 813 gr (1.79 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $299 | $698 |