Clicky

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
35
Overall
37
Kodak Easyshare M5370 front
 
Olympus FE-4000 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs

Kodak Easyshare M5370
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched September 2011
Olympus FE-4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Also Known as X-925
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Easyshare M5370 was manufactured 2 years later than the FE-4000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the FE-4000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus FE-4000

 Easyshare M5370 FE-4000 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011July 2009Fresher by 27 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370

 FE-4000 Easyshare M5370 

Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus FE-4000

 Easyshare M5370 FE-4000 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 enjoys exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus FE-4000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 compared to the FE-4000.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and FE-4000 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Easyshare M5370 and FE-4000.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to produce more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern Easyshare M5370 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Portrait photography details
Olympus FE-4000 Portrait photography details
34
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
20
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Street photography advice
Olympus FE-4000 Street photography advice
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
55
lighter than competition in class (136g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sports photography features
Olympus FE-4000 Sports photography features
29
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
17
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Travel photography information
Olympus FE-4000 Travel photography information
72
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
61
lighter than competition in class (136 grams)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Easyshare M5370 Landscape photography information
Olympus FE-4000 Landscape photography information
43
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
27
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Easyshare M5370
Vlogging with Olympus FE-4000
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen
features face detect focusing
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
28
pretty wide (26mm)
lighter than competition in class (136g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus FE-4000
 Kodak Easyshare M5370Olympus FE-4000
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak Easyshare M5370 Olympus FE-4000
Also called - X-925
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-09-14 2009-07-22
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.6-5.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1600s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format MPEG-1, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lbs) 136 grams (0.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $160 $130