Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus 8000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and 8000 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Easyshare M5370 was released 2 years later than the 8000 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Easyshare M5370 scores against the 8000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus 8000
| Easyshare M5370 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 27 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| 8000 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus 8000
| Easyshare M5370 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 provides physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus 8000 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus 8000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the 8000.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Easyshare M5370 and 8000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Easyshare M5370 and 8000.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern Easyshare M5370 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-09-14 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lbs) | 182 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $160 | $380 |