Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released September 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Easyshare M5370 was unveiled 9 months later than the TG-310 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Easyshare M5370 scores versus the TG-310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Easyshare M5370 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are available at Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Olympus TG-310
| Easyshare M5370 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 9 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| TG-310 | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak Easyshare M5370 and Olympus TG-310
| Easyshare M5370 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Easyshare M5370 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Easyshare M5370 versus Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Easyshare M5370 versus the TG-310.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Easyshare M5370 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Easyshare M5370 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher Easyshare M5370 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Kodak Easyshare M5370 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-09-14 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-1, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $160 | $0 |