Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
55 Imaging
55 Features
80 Overall
65
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 12500 (Boost to 25000)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-400mm (F2.8-4) lens
- 812g - 137 x 97 x 132mm
- Released January 2020
- Superseded the Leica V-Lux 4
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Leica V-Lux 5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Leica. The resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the V-Lux 5 (20MP) is pretty similar but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and V-Lux 5 (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 7 years earlier than the V-Lux 5 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades vs the V-Lux 5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Leica V-Lux 5. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Leica V-Lux 5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Leica V-Lux 5
Astro Zoom AZ651 | V-Lux 5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 5 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
V-Lux 5 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | January 2014 | More recent by 73 months | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 920k | Sharper screen (+320k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Leica V-Lux 5
Astro Zoom AZ651 | V-Lux 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has got physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Leica V-Lux 5 has specifications of 137mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 812 grams (1.79 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Leica V-Lux 5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the V-Lux 5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and V-Lux 5 is 65 and 55 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by going over specs. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and V-Lux 5.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will deliver more detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica V-Lux 5 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Leica V-Lux 5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Leica |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Leica V-Lux 5 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2020-01-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12500 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-400mm (16.7x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, auto w/slow sync and redeye reduction, on, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 lbs) | 812g (1.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 137 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Battery type | - | Built-in |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $419 | $1,550 |