Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Launched February 2014
- Previous Model is Nikon S9500
- Successor is Nikon S9900
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and S9700 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was revealed very close to the S9700 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores against the S9700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Nikon Coolpix S9700. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Nikon S9700
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
| S9700 | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Nikon S9700
| Astro Zoom AZ651 | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | February 2014 | Same age | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features exterior measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Nikon S9700 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the S9700.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and S9700 is 65 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and S9700.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to show extra detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
| Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-01-07 | 2014-02-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | - | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | 232 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $419 | $350 |